BLOGS

OTHER FRONTLINE BLOGS

▶ Would Canada turn to Russia for heavy icebreaking?
▶ Will the Philippines become a failed state?
▶ Will CSC need anti-ballistic missile capability?
▶ Will Canada's G7 Presidency effect reform in Ukraine?
▶ Will Canada and Russia continue to play nice?
▶ Wildfire Responder Support
▶ Why the Canada-U.S. relationship will stay the course
▶ Where was the damn chopper?
▶ We need to stop deluding ourselves
▶ Veterans' road to wellness blocked
▶ Veterans Ombudsman testifies to Senate Subcommittee
▶ USN accepts new warship
▶ Update: General Belzile ineligible for Veterans Wing at Perley Rideau
▶ Unravelling the Omar Khadr payoff
▶ U.S. shuts down its cyber policy office
▶ U.S. Congress wants F35 issues resolved
▶ Trump, Canada, and the Way Ahead
▶ Trump's Realpolitik Policy for NATO and East Europe
▶ Trump Administration: a Template for Change
▶ Transitioning military veterans into entrepreneurship
▶ Training Synergies for the Lockheed F-35B
▶ Tolerance of hate allows it to take root and flourish
▶ Time to get serious about defence preparedness
▶ Time for Lionel Desmond's Canada-150 Inquiry
▶ There has been progress, but is it enough?
▶ The Race for Global Influence
▶ The new Defence Policy is a good start, but ...
▶ The kerfuffle about military CADPAT uniforms
▶ The Great(er) Game: political rhetoric
▶ Suggestions for the Syrian Refugee Initiative
▶ Strategic Communications: The Enemy is Us
▶ Speech from the Throne
▶ Special Prosecutor for the Chief Military Judge
▶ Speaking truth to power on the "interim" fighters
▶ Somalia Retrospective
▶ Soft-power and Military Intimidation
▶ Should ex-military avoid political public service?
▶ Senate Committee weighs in on peacekeeping
▶ Selling UN Peacekeeping to Canadians
▶ Security concerns still in the shadows
▶ Reviewing David Fraser's book on Op Medusa
▶ Reality check for the PM
▶ RCN diplomacy in West Africa deployment
▶ RAF unleashed
▶ Promises and peacekeeping
▶ Pivoting to Missile Deterrence
▶ Peacekeeping results have been mixed
▶ Peacekeeping is not as simple as you thought
▶ Peacekeeping in Africa: sober reflections
▶ Over Africa – Canada's new UN Peace Mission
▶ On fighter aircraft and political games
▶ On a Razor's Edge
▶ Nuclear "tactics" an oxymoron
▶ No place for ethics in politics
▶ New era, as Opposition vows to be "constructive"
▶ More secrecy in govt now, thanks to Access to Info
▶ Moral equivalence with China not acceptable
▶ MND responds to reporters
▶ Military volunteers are being taken for granted
▶ Looking for project funding?
▶ Liberals spending hundreds of Billions: Where are the jobs?
▶ Liberals poised to shut down defence publications
▶ Liberals planning to eject from JSF buy
▶ Let's match the rhetoric with action
▶ Let's have some respect
▶ Legacy Hornets can’t close Canada's capability gap
▶ Leaked intelligence hampers investigation
▶ Last debate was great, but where was defence?
▶ Kudos to the government
▶ Key election questions
▶ Keeping soldiers fit for duty
▶ Just Fighting ISIS is a Fatally Flawed Strategy
▶ Is Trump a symptom of complacent liberal democracy?
▶ Is sending helicopters to Mali good enough?
▶ Is it Time for a Canadian as NATO SecGen?
▶ Is Canada becoming a freeloader again?
▶ Is AI technology creating an ethical dilemma?
▶ Is a lie a mistake? Is it a mistake to lie?
▶ Iraqi forces capture Kurdish-held city
▶ Increasing the female presence in peace ops
▶ Improving Safety for CAF Personnel
▶ Immigration targets are too high says poll
▶ Hybrid submarines, an efficient alternative
▶ How will 'events' shape this government?
▶ How to deter Russia
▶ Free Trade with China ignores security concerns
▶ Former Air Force commanders call on govt to drop Super Hornet buy
▶ Fighter replacement reaching new depths
▶ Fighter replacement entangled by politics
▶ Fighter Procurement Office
▶ Federal Budget Preserves Spending
▶ Federal Budget 2017
▶ Facing the harsh realities of governing
▶ Evidence or Emotion?
▶ Equipping Junior Rangers – solutions & self-esteem
▶ DPR to be released soon
▶ DPR to be released June 7
▶ Don't follow U.S. back to Afghanistan
▶ Dithering or a rethink on peacekeeping intentions?
▶ Defence Policy to support military families
▶ Defence Policy short on short-term funding
▶ Defence Minister talks about plans for Iraqi training
▶ Debate rhetoric ignores humanitarian dimension
▶ Court rejects social obligation of GoC to CAF
▶ Consult before closing down SAR dive crew
▶ Comments from the PM's Security Advisor
▶ Combat Innovation: Australia
▶ Climate Change
▶ Challenges facing UN peacekeepping
▶ Cdn Primer to the G20 Summit in Germany
▶ Cdn Defence Review Essays
▶ Canada violates NATO agreement
▶ Canada should stand strong in trade negotiations
▶ Can USN sink Canada’s IP Piracy policy?
▶ Can the 'Cornwallis Five' receive a fair hearing?
▶ Can Defence Policy create bi-partisan consensus?
▶ Can Canada be an Honest Broker on Ukraine?
▶ CAF needs significant new funding
▶ Cabinet Posts Cause for Optimism?
▶ Boeing vs Trudeau
▶ Badass MND
▶ Australian Fighter purchase is about saving face
▶ Australia resets its Defence Policy
▶ Aussies: Joint Land Combat Force
▶ Assessing Canada’s Defence Policy
▶ Air power interoperability to international integration
▶ Aftermath of the President's Speech
▶ A way ahead in Iraq & Syria
▶ A new military affliction: Thin Skin
▶ A call to action from war veterans' graves
▶ 2017 Canada Army Run Dinner guest speakers
▶ "Strong, Secure, Engaged" will it be properly funded?
▶ "New" terrorism and vulnerable “soft targets”
COMMENTARY
COMMENTARY
Legacy Hornets can’t close Canada's capability gap

Boeing responds to the open letter from former Air Force Commanders who suggest cheaper alternatives to purchasing new Super Hornets.

COMMENTARY
Former Air Force commanders call on govt to drop Super Hornet buy

An open letter from former Air Force commanders to the Prime Minister calls for dropping the Super Hornet plan and buy more legacy Hornets instead due to compelling financial considerations.